Just wondering if the 747-312 ("Big Top") ever flies US West Coast routes, or is it always a Megatop (9V-SF*, 9V-SM*, 9V-SP*) ?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
North America West Coast 747 type: always a megatop?
Collapse
X
-
Am I the only one who found the earlier nicknames palatable and the later ones just getting ridiculous?
I can understand why they called their 743's "big tops" because of the stretched upper deck. That was a tangible difference, clearly and visibly differentiated from the 212's.
To call the 744's "megatops" sounded like a bit of one-upmanship since the "top" on the "megatop" is no more "mega" than the "top" on the "big" top.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SQflyergirl View Post
To call the 744's "megatops" sounded like a bit of one-upmanship since the "top" on the "megatop" is no more "mega" than the "top" on the "big" top.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SQflyergirl View PostAm I the only one who found the earlier nicknames palatable and the later ones just getting ridiculous?
I can understand why they called their 743's "big tops" because of the stretched upper deck. That was a tangible difference, clearly and visibly differentiated from the 212's.
To call the 744's "megatops" sounded like a bit of one-upmanship since the "top" on the "megatop" is no more "mega" than the "top" on the "big" top.
Comment
-
The Difference between the -300 and -400 is that the -400 have a longer range, 2 man tech crew, better avionics, winglets and much more. But overall there is not much difference in the shape of the fuselage. They have the same length of upper deck and also the same pax load.
Comment
-
Originally posted by maxmin View PostJust wondering if the 747-312 ("Big Top") ever flies US West Coast routes, or is it always a Megatop (9V-SF*, 9V-SM*, 9V-SP*) ?
http://www.airliners.net/photo/Singa...312/0651480/M/
then SQ 2/1 to SFO via HKG & HNL, & later it was deployed on SQ16/15 to LAX via TPE & HNL where the passenger from HKG can transit at HNL & onward to LAX, similarly to those TPE passengers, they also got the same 1 hour stop at Honolulu to transit & onward to SFO. Both planes arrived almost the same morning hour at HNL & depart roughly the same time heading to the west coast.
The 1st SQ aircraft to the U.S. was DC-10 where it was painted "California Here We Come" during 1979 where the SQ2/1 had to stop at Guam in between HKG & HNL,
http://www.airliners.net/photo/Singa...-30/0334961/M/
the later on when SQ deployed the 747-200 "Super B", Guam was omitted & only Honolulu left,
http://www.airliners.net/photo/Singa...12B/0127395/M/
when 747-400 "MegaTop" was introduced, HNL station was completely closed down, which I missed very much...!
B747-212 "Super B" on SQ12/11
http://www.airliners.net/photo/Singa...12B/0667187/M/
Plus the B747-212 "Super B" carrying the "California Here We Come" title all over the world:
http://www.airliners.net/photo/Singa...12B/0068552/M/
http://www.airliners.net/photo/Singa...12B/0355412/M/
http://www.airliners.net/photo/Singa...12B/0512731/M/
http://www.airliners.net/photo/Singa...12B/0690917/M/
& the last interesting photo by carrying the 5th engine at HKG...
http://www.airliners.net/photo/Singa...12B/0799698/M/
B747-300 "Big Top" was famous within SQ even though when they retired on its last flight, SQ compliment all those "Big Top"s on its in-house magazine "Outlook" by saying they are the great "Work Horse" for SQ during the 80s...
I particularly like the Big Top went to Maldives...where it was the largest aircraft ever landed on such a small island...!
http://www.airliners.net/photo/Singa...312/0336469/M/
No taxiway available so aircrafts have to make a 180 degree turn on the runway in order to enter the ramp in front of the terminal.
http://www.airliners.net/photo/Singa...312/0336470/M/
Last edited by SQTalker; 27 April 2008, 01:16 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MegatopLover View PostI thought the whole point was that the 747-400 had an even more stretched upper deck than the 747-300. No?Originally posted by StarG View PostThe -400 and -300 both have the same upper deck length AFAIK.
Originally posted by banx007 View PostThe Difference between the -300 and -400 is that the -400 have a longer range, 2 man tech crew, better avionics, winglets and much more.
But overall there is not much difference in the shape of the fuselage. They have the same length of upper deck and also the same pax load.
Some 400 exceptions to the rule:
400F - Same wing as the 400, but no stretched upper deck.
400D - Same stretched upper deck and wing root fairing as the 400, but no wingets.
AFAIK, the only 747 with a larger "top" than the 300/400 is the as yet unborn 748i.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SQTalker View PostI particularly like the Big Top went to Maldives...where it was the largest aircraft ever landed on such a small island...!
Comment
-
Originally posted by SQTalker View PostJust not to go off the topic, yes, Big Top was served during 1983 till 1989 when SQ received the 1st Big Top, it was flown on the SQ12/11...[/IMG]
If I remember correctly, in 1993 SQ12/11 was still a Big Top.
Comment
Comment