Originally posted by Jumbojet Lover
View Post
Just to give you an idea, an A380 requires 190 tons of fuel +/-5 tons for an European sector. A350 is able to accomplish that with less than 90 tons. Yes, A350 carries less pax, but it is easier to fill them up and they are also able to carry more cargo than A380. Most planes also have the ability to derate the engines and MTOW to incur lower ATC and airport charges. With four engines, it also requires/costs more maintenance.
There is a reason many airlines are accelerating their A380 retirements and cancelling outstanding orders. As for fuel tankering, it's not so much about turnaround time but costs. I was told fuel price in SG is one of the lowest in the region. After factoring in fuel hedging, I am sure SQ management takes into account everything before deciding to tanker a flight.
Comment